It’s the perpetual siren call of politicians … or would-be
politicians … especially during election years!
But I caught myself wondering: Back to WHEN, exactly?
… to when all the roads were dirt roads?
… to when there was no FDA and one had to rely on snake oil
salesmen for pharmaceuticals and on the integrity of the run-amok Chicago meat
markets for sustenance?
… to when all the states had their own currencies – and they
were all different?
… to when slavery, child labor and “unnaturalized citizens”
were what powered major industry?
… to when monopoly wasn’t just a board game?
… to when everyone had at least one gun and arguments were
settled by duels?
… to when Al Capone and his “corporate elite” ruled the
streets?
… to before the EPA, when chemical plants, mining industries
and oil refining operations simply dumped their toxic waste directly into air
and water supplies?
… to before the safety nets of Medicare, Medicaid and Social
Security existed?
… to when aspirin, alcohol, opioids and crude surgical
devices were the only medical interventions – besides leeches and blood-letting
– available?
And I thought it worth wondering exactly what it was that made America
great – whenever that might have been?
But, first, there’s a lot more history in the universe to
consider than just the past 250 years of American identity. Can we get any clues from what made OTHER great
civilization great – like China, Mongolia, Japan, Greece, Egypt, Great Britain,
Babylon, the Roman Empire, or the Aztecs, Mayans or Incas?
[At some point, we’re
going to have to ask how we define “Greatness” ... stay tuned.]
From the sheer volume of historical record and archeologic
data, we have some clues about “What it
was … ” that may help us acquire some perspective. Actually, that part of our quest turns out to
be fairly simple: Whoever had the biggest armies, best technology in weaponry
and most efficient and effective supply, communication and transportation
systems ruled the world. From the spoils
of war, these civilizations gained both wealth and worker-bee slaves,
permitting the ruling classes to display opulence of extravagant
proportions. Thus, we see huge and
intricate architectural wonders, exquisitely woven and dyed fabrics, and
ingenious works of art and science – all cultivated and commissioned by the
ruling class.
“Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart [1756-1791] showed
prodigious ability from his earliest childhood. Already competent on keyboard and violin, he composed from the age of five and performed
before European royalty. At 17,
Mozart was engaged as a musician at the Salzburg court …” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolfgang_Amadeus_Mozart
In a somewhat sobering sense, one could say that what made
each of these civilizations “GREAT” was the degree of distance the wealthiest
classes became removed from the poorest classes … as well as from external
threats. The more insulation they had
from discombobulation, the more aspirational – both inspirational and hedonic –
they became. As the wealthiest classes
gained confidence/security, associated financial resources and leisure, they
went about figuring how much more lavishly they could live. And by commissioning the lower classes/slaves
and artisans/craftspersons to do the work, they created “trickle-down”
economics – emphasis on “trickle”.
Early American “Greatness” was not much different. Although child labor was not as prevalent,
slavery and the “indenturing” of immigrants and the poor were prevalent. Natural
resources were abundant. Opportunities
for both the wealthy and ambitious were essentially unlimited ... attracting
both intellectual and venture capital, as well as ardent flesh and blood
aspirants. America was a virtual tabula rasa with only itinerant and
loosely enfranchised inhabitants. Barriers
to advancement, and interference with even incommodious opportunism, were
minimal. And a constitutional framework
protecting individual rights to life, liberty and property, and encouraging “the pursuit of happiness”, provided an irresistible
enticement for both individual and societal actualization. [Should we underscore the impact of
immigrants?]
Here we take a moment to reflect on
measures of GREATNESS. Someone
said that the true measure of greatness
in a civilization is the way it treats its most vulnerable citizens. It’s worth some consideration. More commonly, we think of greatness as
including the size of armies, the amount of land they control, the number of
citizens enrolled, the status of arts and education, benchmark advances in science
and technology, the sophistication of their infrastructure (water, energy,
communications, transportation and supply lines), health and wellbeing of the
population, and the impact of goods and services, as measured by world-wide
trade. Importantly, and increasingly so,
greatness may also be measured by alliances – by how much positive influence a
country has and can maintain in the affairs of the world. NOTE: The degree of positive world influence
OTHER than a military presence might be dubbed a defining attribute of
GREATNESS.
So how are we doing?
Unquestionably, America has had brilliant moments of greatness – as
measured by all but a few of the above – during its relatively brief history. But 1) we do have to own up to the fact that many
of those moments have been tainted by disenfranchisement of its most vulnerable
citizens, and 2) the formula for greatness has been silently but inexorably
changing. Opportunity is no longer as unlimited
as it was. Yes, there is still unlimited
opportunity for some, but for far fewer individuals over time. Only one person in the US can become
President every 4 years – that’s 8 chances out of 320 million in a lifetime in
2016 versus 8 chances out of 76 million in 1900. Meanwhile, technology is displacing
mainstream employment opportunities and corporate organizational structures are
collapsing, cutting out the middle, which, historically, provided stepping
stones for advancement. And while
America remains a mecca for higher education, we’re educating the world’s elite
and letting site-based primary and secondary school systems for our own citizens
degenerate into meccas for self-esteem development, athletics and tribal
inbreeding.
Bottom line: There is only one direction we can go if we
aspire to “take America to GREATNESS … again”.
And it’s not BACK! America has to
become intensely engaged in the business of reinventing itself for a new day
and for collective challenges, not only for free-reign “Rugged
Individualism” … including finding better ways to take care of its most
vulnerable citizens. Quartermaster